Iris

From the Quill of Anne de Plume

Who is a Human?

with 12 comments

For the last few weeks, I was absorbed reading Arvind Adiga’s novel The White Tiger which had borrowed from Eddie’s Kitchen :) . My interest in the novel was based on the  Booker Award that it received last year. Frankly, I was not aware of Adiga’s writings before I came across the piece of news that he had beat Amitav Ghosh’s Sea of Poppies in the race for Booker. The blurb claims that this novel is a “page turner” and can be read at one go. But I took longer to complete it than my usual pace since I found the “realities” described in that text very difficult to digest. Not that the “realities” described are “unrealistic”, but rather are too “harshly-realistic”, sometimes at the cost of language, style and aesthetic sensibilities. Probably, the author had deliberately chosen a style that is anti-aesthetic or “anti-literary-ness”. However, Adiga is not the first author to have presented “India” in this fashion, there are many known and unknown authors who have headed the brigade. In fact, Adiga seems to be directly influenced by none other than Sir Vidya, i.e., V.S. Naipaul and his India writings, especially An Area of Darkness. Adiga keeps invoking the term “darkness” in his novel reminding us of Sir Vidya’s experiences of India as a mind-boggling, problematic “area of darkness” in the first of his India trilogy.

Keeping aside the literary jargon that we usually get entangled with, Adiga’s novel brought some of my own real life experiences fresh into memory. I have been asking the question, “who is a human?” from the past few experiences that I have had. About a month ago, while I was waiting for a friend to arrive at the Ghatkopar station had a strange experience. Mumbai starts sweltering by mid-March and noons are especially hot. It was around 1 pm and the station was apparently less crowded than usual. I stood at the magazine vendor, peeping into some of the new titles that are on stand this year. Each local train that arrived at the platform dumped hordes of unknown, unnamed faces, each face seeming no different than the other and then another departing local would come and scoop away half the population like mushrooms scooped with a soup spoon from the soup bowl. The heat made people angrier and more restless than possibly they would be. Each one seemed to be in a hurry to reach some mysterious destination. With perfect nonchalance, I kept my eyes fixed on the new numbers displayed at the magazine stall and muttered under my breath a distorted version of T.S.Eliot’s Wasteland: “March is the cruelest month that mixes sweat with anger” (original: “April is the cruelest month mixing memory with desire”) .

Suddenly, I spotted a tattered old man, more clarification, a tattered blind old-man, trying to alight from the footbridge connecting the platforms. He was desperately seeking help from commuters requesting them to guide him down the stairs of the steep footbridge. No one listened to the  old man and none stopped to help him either. I was in the other end of the platform and far away from the old man, could only helplessly observe him faltering in his steps, trying to balance himself as he got down the stairs of the bridge. Somehow he did manage to get to the platform, but his ordeal did not end there. The man intended to board a local train bound for Ambernath and evidently he was unable to board it himself . He badly needed help and went on requesting people to help, but to no use. Finally, in utter desperation the man put one hand on the shoulder of a passerby and requested him to just make him board the train. The passerby who probably was also one of those innumerable faces who had to hurry for some destination, rudely and angrily jerked away the blind man’s hand. He was so rude  that the poor old man just lost his balance, lost his stick, tumbled and fell down badly on the platform. He was bruised, hurt and the dark glasses he had was broken into pieces. Except a young student who came running from the farthest end of the platform to assist the man to get up, no one else bothered to even stop for a second. The  gentleman had tears in his eyes — tears of frustration and tears of blindness. I had come running from the another end of the platform to see if he was ok, and could make out that he was just very shaken and hurt. He just said to me in Marathi that he wanted to go to Ambernath to meet his daughter and son-in-law, but people thought he was a beggar and was just creating nuisance. Hmmm! What difference does it make to have or not to have eyes? We are also blind….

My friend reached on time and we came out of the station. Outside Ghatkopar station there was a queue for the BEST buses. It did not contain 5, 10 or 15 people; there were thousands waiting for one bus. The queue snaked down to the streets and almost covered a kilometer distance. Frustrating! In the heat, in the full summer noon, thousands standing in queue to board a bus. My friend sighed and said; “thank god! we have auto rickshaws here! It would be a torture to wait in queue for these buses!” We had to pay just 40 rupees to reach IIT by an auto, quiet simple and affordable. But for some of those who were standing in that queue for a bus, that 40 rupees was half-a-day’s salary.

These days I wonder what happens to the “super-power” nation that India is prophesied to be. With elections just round the corner and each political party bragging of its greatness, the question of “who is a human?” becomes even more pertinent. “Murk” is the only word that defines the situation here. Maybe we will have a “super-power” consumer nation down the years, all that we have now is easy money, minority politics and post-election alliances. The rest are indifferent people like us who get an easy ride through auto and taxis, a comfortable room, malls to shop, air conditioned labs, air conditioned airplanes to gain a safe passage out of the country and lead rest of the life in some “cool” place, sighing over the deteriorating human situation of India. People like me, Adiga, Arundhati Roy, Danny Boyle, etc. have one aspect that is similar — we all live in safe ghettos while talking or writing about the “inhuman”. I bet I will never stand in a long queue to get to board a bus and so will Danny Boyle who can never substitute real “shit” for his “peanut butter” to shoot another Slumdog and so will Adiga who may not choose to visit the “darkness” that won him a Booker. The question of who is a human applies to us as well.

If being “human” has certain values, “virtues” or “expectations” attached to it, then the term has got really problematic dimensions. But, if being human means just being a higher-ape, a biological being, I have no issues. In fact the term “human” has of late come to substitute “man”, as the latter was considered to be gender insensitive by some thoughtful critics. Terms like “physically challenged”, “mentally challenged”, etc. also came into vogue as terms which carry “sensitivity” towards the “lesser capable” and to give a more “humanitarian” angle to certain physical disorders. But, that day in Ghatkopar when I saw the gentleman struggling and being insulted in the platform in front of thousands, my idea of these “sensitive” terms completely changed. They are mere terms in critical jargon having hollow meaning, because there are millions out there who will not sympathize or empathize with a man as “physically challenged”, but might just identify a person as a “blind man” or a “leper” or a “deaf” person. The physical attribute goes as an identification mark, because all these jargon of gender-sensitive, physical attribute-sensitive, are limited to bookish, snobbish, aristocrats like us who hardly venture out into the platform to help a “blind man” cope with his “blindness”.

Who is a human? Still the questions lurks in my mind…

Written by Anne De Plume

April 16, 2009 (Thursday) at 1:37 am

12 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. very well written! keep it up!

    alwaysindian

    April 16, 2009 (Thursday) at 11:54 am

  2. Human that means :
    1. Good Sense for all.
    2. Well Thinking Power.
    3. Be a great personality.
    4. Nice behave to all.
    5. Not selfish in his work.

    These are combinely form as Human.

    Kumarakom

    April 16, 2009 (Thursday) at 12:44 pm

  3. I am a human :) Well written anne.

    One thing you rightly said… “the slum sells well”, either in the name of slumdog or in God of small things or in white tiger or in Sadak or in Garibi hatao nara of Congress or in Nano bhagao of Trinumul or laljhanda of Communists….

    Good work, keep writing :)

    aamjunta

    April 16, 2009 (Thursday) at 8:10 pm

  4. woah! i found your post chaotic and jumpy… had to read it twice to catch the thread…was it deliberately written that way, to convey your angst? or was it that this was the only way you could have written it, given the incidents you witnessed?
    starting off with Adiga to the human being question (jump?) to the oppressive mumbai weather (jump) and its effect on commuters to the “help-less” blind man and his accident to the long queue on the bus stop (jump) to cost of auto to a rant about “us previlaged” back to the question of who a human is to PC stuff (jump)….
    (… or maybe my naukri is already turning me into a vegetable :-( )

    sreyash

    April 16, 2009 (Thursday) at 9:17 pm

  5. @ shrek: thanks for the critique :) . You are right there are apparently too many unconnected issues. I have deliberately written the post as “jumpy” and “chaotic”. All the rant that you are talking about has only one thread that is common and which was solely important to me : “who is a human?” . From Adiga, to the plight of the old man, to the cost of auto-rickshaw, to elections, to “our” privileged status, to debates on whether “man” or “human” or “blind” or “physically challenged”, if you observe, all these have one common philosophical thread and that is the problem of being “human beings”.

    The missing thread between Adiga and my own experiences is connected at one point where I concede that we sell “human-ness” to some privileged minorities by pointing out everything that is “inhuman”, but never going to the “actual” field where all this scholarship is needed to create “human beings”. To be “human” as far as I understand is not limited to closed room theorizing or seminar room debates, as many scholars, writers, etc tend to think. They are mere “comfort zones”. There is more to it and that is what is my problem…sincerely, do help me if you have some solutions…

    Thanks again for that amazing critique :)

    Anne De Plume

    April 16, 2009 (Thursday) at 11:09 pm

  6. As against your experience, the old man in my story was helped get on a crowded local at the bustling Andheri station by a 6 foot tall Sardarji, so much that he held him by the hand and led him right from the steps to the insides of the crowded local.
    Questions i want to pose: Are we being made indifferent by the political rant that we hear time and again, or are we inherently indifferent?
    Is the loss of humaneness a departure from the democratic society that we lived in peacefully(where an everyday hello to the neighbour has turned into a complete ignorance to who lives there) to a more consumerist fast forward life chasing the carrot??

    eddieskitchen

    April 17, 2009 (Friday) at 1:39 pm

  7. Human values are lost when you are put into difficult situations, it’s only about few people who survive the pressure of this highly competitive world.

    As I always say, it’s about choices we make under the situation we are put in which decides our acts as humane or in-humane.

    The moment your choice is proved right you are treated like a hero and good person and so so, but if your choice doesn’t seem right to a few or maybe the person isn’t at fault but still people would try to label him.

    The thing which hurts me is that except few heartless people all do our best under the circumstances but everything is decided by god whether our choices were correct or not…

    Ashish Gourav

    April 17, 2009 (Friday) at 4:06 pm

  8. @ eddy: the kind of loss of “humaneness” that you are pointing out is a serious philosophical concern right now. This crisis that we in India are talking of was something which the West (read Europe and America) has been facing since early 20th century. Literature of late 19th and early 20th in the west anticipated this huge loss of humaneness that we are actually living today. Politics is part of the story not the entire story which begins from the level of individual and families. Fortunately, your story shows some hope.

    A suggestion: Read Mathew Arnold’s “Dover Beach” and W.B.Yeats’s “Second Coming”. Both deal with this crisis of humaneness.

    Anne De Plume

    April 18, 2009 (Saturday) at 1:33 am

  9. @aamjunta, @ashish,@kumarakom, @alwaysindian: thanks for the supplements and appreciation. To be or not to be “humane” is one’s own choice, but the world needs people, especially the younger generation to realize the significance of being “human beings”.

    Anne De Plume

    April 18, 2009 (Saturday) at 8:46 pm

  10. Hi Anne
    A very good post on falling sensitivity in our society. Being born as human does not make one as human rather it is the charatcter which makes a person as human or inhuman. Reading your post triggered an interesting thought i.e. Why One human’s misery is another human’s pleausre? Be it reading pleasure in the form of page-turner novel or viewing pleasure of Slumdog, or feel-good factor about one’s status!! Why our society is becoming so insensitive to human values?
    May be one fine day some human will find an answer.

    Naren

    April 24, 2009 (Friday) at 12:40 pm

  11. I liked your post very much. But did not understand your definition of human! I think you have also not understood the true qualities of a human being.

    Many like you always calculate “how much you give and how much you get? That is the point where all qualities of human-ness fail.

    Anyway, it was just a passing comment :)

    shalman

    May 2, 2009 (Saturday) at 9:49 pm

  12. You are right Shalman the people who claim to protect “human-ness” are the ones who can be most “inhuman” and that might also be me :) … fault accepted

    Anne De Plume

    May 3, 2009 (Sunday) at 1:32 am


Leave a Reply